(This was one of the articles which my laziness forbade me to posts. XD)
Just hours ago, I and my classmates attended a lecture-forum entitled “Going Undercover: Making a Commitment to Quality Journalism”. The speaker was Dr. Gary Swanson, a multi-awarded and distinguished journalist from the University of Northwestern Colorado.
He was a great speaker: full of great insights, great experiences and of great ideas. He enlightened us about good and bad journalism, journalistic responsibility, electronic journalism and the importance of citing sources. He also touched on digital enhancement and photo manipulation, making some of us a bit uneasy—needless to say guilty (but we don’t publish ours, just for the sake of private humor, hehehe).
Funny because I am not a frequent visitor of YouTube, but when I close my eyes while the forum is progressing, it’s like listening to a YouTube video, only the speaker is closer and much more..alive.
He inspired us, not only because our field (Communication and Media Studies) is one which is directly affected by his lecture, but also because he is right. “One of the best things about being alive is watching the world change”. And we, as future media practitioners, are the ones most privilege to see and/or make that change.
He lamented about how the great information overflow is challenging the thinking capabilities of humans. “In a world where information is available, how can we even think?” Indeed, he is true. Instead of our brains, our fingers have done the thinking job for us.
I, however, disagree with his ethnocentric self. He told us a story about how his Chinese wife fancied a squirrel because it was her first time seeing one when she migrated with him to the United States. Then, for rapport, he asked us: Do you know what a squirrel is? Do you know how it looks like?
DUH. (No need to elaborate here, I think.)
This was after he told us that “The people in the United States know very little, or nothing at all, about the Philippines”. We understand this bit. We are not a country which is known for being an economic entity or for nuclear weapons. But to ask us a question so contradictory of his earlier statement about information overflow is simply dumb. “How can he even think?” Nah, just kidding. But seriously, I could have stuffed the squirrel up to his ***. We have Internet and schools here, hello? One of them is shading your Caucasian head now while you lecture.
But except for that part, I guess its safe to say that we have learned a lot from him. That’s what’s more important anyway. “If you can walk away from here with just one thought, then I’ve done my job”.
Ethnocentricity aside, thanks a lot still, Dr. Swanson!